Bearskin...

Bearskin...

Thursday, February 4, 2016

A Marxist View of Hans Jakob Christoph von Grimmelshausen’s Bearskin


#BetterDaysBearskin
 The promise of wealth leads to devilish circumstances

            Bearskin tells the story of a man that makes a deal with the devil in order to achieve wealth. The characters often find themselves in situations dependent on the accumulation of wealth or status over humility. As with Marxism, we see how economic status changes how the characters value each other and themselves and affects their actions. We will look at this version of Bearskin and explore its Marxist viewpoints.
In this version of Bearskin, by Hans Jakob Christoph von Grimmelshausen, a soldier in dire circumstances accepts an offer from a spirit in order to save his own life and gain great wealth. The offer stated that for seven years the soldier was to wear only a bearskin robe and “was not to wash, nor cut his nails, nor blow his nose, nor even wipe his behind” (Ashliman). In return, the spirit would provide him with food, drink, and endless supply of money. They agreed to the terms and found that despite his rancid appearance the money he had was often enough motivation for people to provide him service or shelter. One day, a nobleman saw the soldier, Bearskin, at an inn and was impressed by his wealth and made a proposal to him. The nobleman told him he could marry one of his three daughters and took the soldier to meet them. Upon seeing the Bearskin and his terrible appearance, two of the girls paid him no attention. The youngest daughter, however, accepted her father’s will and agreed to marry Bearskin. To formalize the agreement Bearskin took a gold ring, twisted it into two pieces, and gave her one piece and departed saying he would return. At the completion of the seven years, Bearskin returned cleaned up, well dressed, and in a fancy carriage to claim his bride. Upon seeing the now handsome Bearksin, the two sisters who refused him before were so envious and mad that they had lost their chance that they killed themselves. The devil then earned two souls for the price of one.   
            In Marxism, there is the belief that social and economic conditions influence how and what people value. In the story, Bearskin accepts a seven-year commitment to live in filth and disgust in order to achieve a great amount of wealth. The man was probably of the lower class and thus forced into the military due to his social and economic status. He found himself in a war that he did not want to fight and thus deserted. The devil then took advantage of the man’s situation by offering him wealth when he was suffering the most. The man in desperation and seeing the opportunity to improve his socioeconomic status accepts the offer. After he accepts, we see the impact the money has on those around him. “He took lodgings in a village inn, and discovered soon enough that his great wealth was ample compensation for his strange looks and ill smell” (Ashliman). Despite how grotesque his appearance and smell was the economics of the situation always kept people willing to serve him. Even the nobleman who offers his daughter for marriage was “impressed by Bearskin's lavish and generous expenditures” (Ashliman). The nobleman did not consider if Bearskin was a good man, but only that he was wealthy. The only prerequisite for the nobleman’s daughter was a sum of money that would appease him. In the end, even the deal the devil made was an investment of sorts. He acquired two souls by investing just one. 
            All through the story, we continuously see the characters acting for their economic benefit. Bearskin makes a deal to increase his wealth and status and come out on top. On the other hand, the sisters that judged him for outward appearance lost their lives for assuming he came from a lower class. A Marxist viewpoint is continually applicable throughout this version of Bearskin and its emphasis of wealth and its power to affect people’s choices. 
Works Cited

Ashliman, D.L. “Bearskin and other folktales of type 361.” Univeristy of Pittsburgh, 24 October 2013. Web. 03 Feb 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment